Desk Checking and Peer Assessment

Open its course - Software Quality Engineering

Desk Checking and Peer Assessment

Topic Questions: 27
MCQs	T/F	FiB	SQ
7 7 0	10 10 0	10 10 0	0 0 0

Question Type Legends
	Easy		Medium		Difficult

MCQs T/F FiB Short Qs

Open its course - Software Quality Engineering

Multiple Choice Questions for Desk Checking and Peer Assessment

1 Which of the following is a criterion included on the Peer Ratings evaluation form to assess program quality?
1. Was the programmer's name clearly visible on the listing?
2. Was the program easy to understand?
3. How many lines of code were executed per second?
4. Did the code comply with the organization's budget constraints?
- View Answer
2 During the Peer Ratings review session, how many programs is each participant typically given to evaluate?
1. One program (either a 'finest' or 'poorer' one).
2. Two programs (one 'finest' and one 'poorer').
3. Four programs (two 'finest' and two 'poorer').
4. All programs submitted by every member of the group.
- View Answer
3 When selecting programs to be reviewed in a Peer Ratings session, what is each participant asked to contribute?
1. All modules they have written in the last six months.
2. Two programs: one representing their finest work and one they consider to be of poorer quality.
3. Four programs selected randomly from their most recent project.
4. Only the most complex module they have ever designed.
- View Answer
4 In a Peer Ratings process, what is the minimum number of participants required to preserve the anonymity of the participants?
1. 2
2. 4
3. 6
4. 10
- View Answer
5 What is the primary purpose of the 'Peer Ratings' technique in software quality engineering?
1. To provide a formal grade for a programmer's performance to be used for salary reviews.
2. To allow programmers to self-evaluate their own programming skills anonymously.
3. To identify and correct every logical error before the program is compiled.
4. To provide a public ranking of the best and worst programmers in a department.
- View Answer
6 Desk checking is described as being most effective when performed by which individual?
1. The original author of the program.
2. A person other than the author of the program.
3. The project manager.
4. A customer representative.
- View Answer
7 What is the primary psychological reason that desk checking is often considered relatively unproductive?
1. It requires expensive automated tools that are difficult to configure.
2. It lacks the team environment where people feel motivated to 'show off' by finding errors.
3. It is too disciplined and rigid for most programmers to follow effectively.
4. It focuses only on high-level design rather than the actual logic of the code.
- View Answer

Programs

Desk Checking and Peer Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions for Desk Checking and Peer Assessment

Subject Expert

Learning Experience Platform